1. Set theory
You keep on saying that if all objects in a set posses a certain property, then the set itself has that property. You give the example that if every brick in a wall is red, then the wall itself is red. Well this is true for this specific example, but there is a reason why many mathematicians dislike examples; they can often mislead you from the correct definition. Examples and metaphors are good to explain things, but you often use them as if they had full explanatory power which they often do not.
To convince you of this truth, I'm going to give you an example. There is a thing called a Möbius strip (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%B6bius_strip <-- there is a nice picture so you fully understand, you can make one yourself as well). Now lets fill a set with objects that are triangles. A triangle has two sides and three edges. It is possible to place these triangles so they form a Möbius strip, and as soon as you place the last triangle, the set will have one side, and one edge. This is in other words a set with objects, where every object posses' properties which the whole set does not. You should study more math
Another example, if every brick in the wall is cubic doesn't mean that the wall is cubic. If you have a set of odd numbers doesn't mean that the number of objects in the set is odd.
2. Causality is time-bound
You said on page 5 in this thread (and that's not the only place you've said it in) that when you sit on a chair, the effect (chair holding up your ass) is simultaneous and that would suggest that cause and effect is not always time-bound. This is wrong. The cause you're talking about is the mechanical cause, and believe it or not, the cause is time bound in a mechanical way in this example. The reason why your ass does not go through your chair is due to electric forces on atomic level in the chair and your ass that is repelling each other. When they meet, the forces get stronger and stronger until they reach a balance when the pushing force is equally big as the forces between your ass and the chair. It is time-bound.
3. Mechanical cause
You say that every effect in this universe need a cause (the way you've talked about cause sound like you mead a mechanical cause). Well this is not really true. Take for example radioactivity. If you give an electron energy it will be excited and pop out to a level with higher energy. Sooner or later it will pop back, but there is no mechanical cause whatsoever which comes directly prior the back-popping. The jump back happens and you can determine with experiment only the probability for when it will happen. This probability alters with element and how much energy you give the electron.
4. Rational thinking
You have said that matter is not capable of doing rational conclusion, therefore there must exist something immaterial. This is very smug scientifically to say because it is outside the boarders of science. Empirically, you are matter and you think therefore it is possible. There is no need for anything else. As soon as you start talking about immaterial things such as divine intervention or soul, you are talking about metaphysics and scientists stopped doing that long ago because there is no way to put up at model for it, to measure it, confirm theories about it etcetera. Only philosophers are doing metaphysics and they will not come to any conclusion. Therefore there is no use talking about metaphysics at all, (you see why there is no point discussing a creator of the universe?).
I must say that I am disappointed in most guys here. What is this? 4:th grade where it is ok to gang up and bully someone like you do. Sure, it is annoying when someone not so good at logic, physics and math does a lot of incorrect claims but I can't say that the counterarguments are so good all the time either.
Anthony, my best advice to you is to leave all forums about religion you currently are writing in and start doing real math, physics and logic courses. You will learn much much more and you won't be bullied because you can't understand replies which are not pedagogical if you want good understanding of real stuff. The aim of this post is in no way patronizing and I hope you see this as a response to your arguments.
